Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /nfs/c02/h02/mnt/21094/domains/jamiemaing.com/html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php on line 2695

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /nfs/c02/h02/mnt/21094/domains/jamiemaing.com/html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/operations.class.php on line 2699

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /nfs/c02/h02/mnt/21094/domains/jamiemaing.com/html/wp-content/plugins/revslider/includes/output.class.php on line 3581
Heapr: Better than the Traditional Google Search? – Jamie Maing

Heapr: Better than the Traditional Google Search?

Pizza Gigi Equals $1M in Marijuana
February 15, 2011
Custom Men’s Dress Shirts: Design-ur Clothes
February 18, 2011
Show all

Heapr: Better than the Traditional Google Search?

So I came across an interesting site called Heapr. Not exactly a name that's easily remembered, but what this site could do amazed me and I wondered whether something like this will eventually gain traction to become popular. Seeing as it consolidates all your searching into one engine I can see how it's useful

Heapr Logo

So I came across an interesting site called Heapr. Not exactly a name that’s easily remembered, but what this site could do amazed me and I wondered whether something like this will eventually gain traction to become popular. Seeing as it consolidates all your searching into one engine I can see how it’s useful, but at the same time not everyone wants to search that way. They have options to turn things off, but do we really want to be fiddling with settings whenever we want to search? Isn’t it more convenient to just search without all the settings and options? I would this so.

Regardless, here’s the site and I’m hoping this thing gets more attention. It’s really good – I like it particularly because it incorporates Wolfram-Alpha and Twitter. What are your thoughts? Any good? Worth adopting as a general search engine? What would you improve?

1 Comment

  1. ig says:

    Fastidious replies in return of this difficulty with solid arguments and explaining everything on the topic of that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.